K
– 3 Program Review
The
goal of K-3 programs is to develop the whole child. In understanding
some programs for students do not offer themselves to paper and
pencil assessments, an annual self-assessment of a school’s K-3
program provides an opportunity for considering how well a school is
meeting the different aspects of the program and formatively
analyzing areas of strength and areas for growth.
The
focus of the program review is on program
improvement. Consider the program through the lens of its four
purposes. The program review is intended to:
- Improve the quality of teaching and learning for all students in all programs.
- Allow equitable access for all students to provide experiences that contribute to becoming well-rounded, productive citizens.
- Allow student demonstration of understanding beyond a paper-and-pencil test.
- Ensure a school-wide natural integration of the program skills across all contents, beyond the program area.
The
Program Review Rubric, for all five programs, is divided into four
standards: Curriculum and Instruction, Formative and Summative
Assessment, Professional Learning and Leadership: Support and
Monitoring.
Each
of the standards is marked by demonstrators that identify a strong,
successful program. When reviewing a program, consider the
demonstrators as the over-arching strengths of a standard within a
program. The demonstrators comprise the focus of the program. Each
demonstrator has a set of characteristics to assist schools in
identifying the strengths and areas of growth related to the
demonstrator. These characteristics assist in decision making for
continuous improvement and in determining scores for the
demonstrators.
Standard One:
Curriculum and Instruction
|
Demonstrator
One: Student
Access/Aligned and Rigorous Curriculum– All students have
equitable access to high quality, rigorous curriculum and
instruction that is aligned to the Kentucky Academic Standards in
the K-3 program.
|
Characteristic
A: Students have equitable access to curriculum that is rigorous
and addresses the intent of the Kentucky Academic Standards (KAS).
|
Characteristic
B: Students have equitable access to cross-curricular instruction
that is culturally responsive.
|
Characteristic
C: Students have equitable access to cross-curricular instruction
that includes authentic learning experiences.
|
Characteristic
D: The curriculum is reviewed annually and revised as needed.
|
The
school is Meeting
the Expectation
for Demonstrator One: Student Access by – meeting
3 of the 4 characteristics, Must include A & B
|
| Demonstrator Two: Kentucky Systems of Intervention (KSI)/Response to Intervention (RtI)* – A school uses an established systematic, comprehensive system that addresses accelerated learning, achievement gaps, highly-effective instruction, readiness to learn and student transitions. A school provides a seamless framework, using state and federal funding that addresses academic and behavioral needs and is accessible to all students. |
Characteristic
A: Support for early intervention is provided through a
multi-tiered system of support including differentiated as well as
targeted, intensive academic and behavioral interventions.
|
Characteristic
B: Universal screening and diagnostic assessments are used to
determine individual student needs and baseline performance.
Multiple sources of data are used when determining the level of
intervention services needed.
|
Characteristic
C: Academic and behavioral Interventions are evidence-based and
vary in intensity and duration to meet the needs and to maximize
the achievement of the individual student.
|
Characteristic
D: Interventions are implemented with fidelity and delivered by
individuals most qualified to provide the intervention services.
|
Characteristic
E: Advancement of the individual student is monitored through a
comparison of baseline data collected prior to intervention and
ongoing progress data, including documentation of assessments,
measures of behavior, progress during instruction and evaluation,
at regular intervals for continuous need analysis.
|
Characteristic
F: individual student reports are shared with the
parents/guardians of each student in kindergarten through grade 3
that summarizes the student’s skills in mathematics, reading and
writing; the student’s behavior and any other intervention plans
and services being delivered.
|
Characteristic
G: The RtI process allows ease of student movement between tiers
to meet student needs in a timely manner.
|
Characteristic
H: The school effectively uses the intervention tab.
|
Characteristic
I: Increased time with teacher(s) rather than computer based
intervention.
|
| The school is Meeting the Expectation for Demonstrator Two: RtI by meeting the 6 characteristics A-F required by House Bill 69 (704 KAR 3:095) |
*
House Bill 69 (704 KAR 3:095)
Standard
Two: Formative and Summative Assessment
|
| Demonstrator One: Assessments – Teachers use multiple assessment processes to inform, guide, develop and revise instructional strategies and curriculum to enhance student learning and achievement. |
Characteristic
A: Teachers embed day-to-day/week-to-week/informal assessments to
monitor progress and to guide instruction (aligned to the school’s
systematic plan/policy).
|
Characteristic
B: Teachers use multiple and developmentally appropriate
assessment methods (e.g., formative, screening, diagnostic,
interim, benchmark, summative) to systematically gather data about
student understanding of learning targets, reflect on instruction
and make adjustments to instruction.
|
Characteristic
C: Teachers provide regular and meaningful opportunities for
students to revise and to apply new learning before summative
products are assessed.
|
Characteristic
D: Teachers, peers and others (principals, community members,
support staff, etc.) provide timely and constructive feedback on
students’ products as part of an on-going feedback process.
|
The
school is Meeting
the Expectation
for Demonstrator One: Assessment by
meeting 2-3 characteristics,
Must include A &
B |
| Demonstrator Two: Expectations for student learning – Teachers communicate high expectations and use common standards for student learning. |
Characteristic
A: Teachers use and share learning targets and objectives that are
aligned to standards with students.
|
Characteristic
B: Teachers use rubrics/scoring guides that are clearly defined;
students have input on success criteria and/or rubrics when
appropriate.
|
Characteristic
C: Teachers and students collaborate to set goals that are
informed by feedback and assessment.
|
Characteristic
D: Teachers regularly share student progress toward meeting
learning targets and objectives with families.
|
The
school is Meeting
the Expectation
for Demonstrator Two: Expectations by meeting
2-3 characteristics
Must include A &
C |
Standard
Three: Professional Learning
|
Demonstrator:
Opportunity/Participation
– Professional learning opportunities are planned according to
Kentucky Professional Learning Standards with the teachers’
learning needs in mind in response to data available about current
teacher practice and student learning in the context of the
components and indicators of effectiveness in The Framework for
Teaching. Not only are professional learning opportunities
planned, but teachers and school leaders participate in
professional learning. In
this standard, school leadership is defined as
SBDM/principal/principal designee.
|
Characteristic
A: School leadership ensures regular and consistent access to
job-embedded and program specific (K-3) professional learning
opportunities.
|
Characteristic
B: School leadership allocates regular and consistent time within
the school calendar for K-3 teachers to collaborate on
programmatic improvements and to exchange ideas with other K-3
educators.
|
Characteristic
C: School leadership regularly and consistently facilitates
professional learning opportunities to support the K-3 program.
|
Characteristic
D: Teachers choose and participate in relevant professional
learning opportunities (e.g., content cadres, PLCs, workshops) or
professional organizations to increase K-3 teacher effectiveness.
|
Characteristic
E: School leadership participates in professional learning (K-3)
alongside teachers.
|
The
school is Meeting
the Expectation
for the Demonstrator: Opportunity/Participation by meeting
3-4 characteristics
Must A, C & D |
Standard
Four: Leadership: Support and Monitoring
|
| Demonstrator: Policies & Monitoring – School leadership establishes and monitors implementation of policies, provides adequate resources, facilities, space and instructional time to support effective instructional programs. In this standard, school leadership is defined as SBDM/principal/principal designee. |
| Characteristic A: School leadership ensures K-3 teachers have the opportunity to participate in planning the annual school budget. |
| Characteristic B: School leadership ensures K-3 teachers receive equitable planning time (and travel time for itinerant teachers). |
| Characteristic C: School leadership ensures K-3 teachers have access to necessary resources to implement the program. |
| Characteristic D: School leadership ensures that decisions related to K-3 programs are based on student needs and interests. |
| Characteristic E: School leadership communicates and involves the school staff, parents and community in making decisions about the school’s K-3 programs. |
The
school is Meeting
the Expectation
for the Demonstrator – Policies/Monitoring by meeting
3-4 characteristics
Must include C, D &
E |
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.